How IRSB Compares
IRSB vs existing approaches to intent accountability and on-chain reputation.
Intent protocols have internal reputation. Restaking protocols have generic slashing. Social reputation protocols have peer reviews. IRSB is the only cross-protocol accountability standard that combines execution receipts, solver bonds, dispute resolution, and portable reputation — purpose-built for intent-based transactions.
| Feature | IRSB | UniswapX | CoW Protocol | 1inch Fusion | Across Protocol | Ethos Network | EigenLayer |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execution Proof | ✓ | ~ | ✕ | ✕ | ~ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Bonds / Staking | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dispute Resolution | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ~ | ✕ |
| Reputation Portability | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Cross-Protocol | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Intent-Specific | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
UniswapX
Intent DEXCoW Protocol
Intent DEX1inch Fusion
Intent AggregatorAcross Protocol
Intent BridgeEthos Network
On-chain ReputationEigenLayer
Restaking / SlashingHow Each Compares
UniswapX
Intent DEXUniswap's intent-based evolution. Dutch auction orders with massive liquidity. Top 3 solvers handle 90% of volume.
Their approach
Internal filler reputation based on fill rate and speed within the UniswapX system.
How IRSB differs
Internal filler reputation only — siloed within UniswapX. No standardized receipts, no dispute process, no portable score.
CoW Protocol
Intent DEXPioneered batch auctions and MEV protection. Strong solver network with competitive order flow.
Their approach
Internal solver scoring based on surplus delivered. Solvers compete in batch auctions.
How IRSB differs
Internal solver scoring only. No on-chain receipts. No formal dispute mechanism. Reputation stays within CoW.
1inch Fusion
Intent AggregatorBroadest cross-chain support (13+ networks). Gasless swaps since 2022. Top 4 solvers handle ~90% of volume.
Their approach
Internal resolver scoring with delegation and staking within the Fusion system.
How IRSB differs
Internal resolver scoring. No receipts. No dispute resolution. No cross-protocol reputation portability.
Across Protocol
Intent Bridge$20B+ transferred, 14M+ transactions. Leading intent-based cross-chain bridge with optimistic verification.
Their approach
Relayer reputation tracked internally. UMA optimistic oracle for dispute resolution.
How IRSB differs
Relayer reputation is siloed. No standardized receipt format. Disputes use UMA oracle, not a general-purpose intent dispute system.
Ethos Network
On-chain ReputationFirst major on-chain credibility protocol. Live on Base. Vouching, reviews, slashing, and reputation markets.
Their approach
Social/peer-based reputation from reviews, vouches, and attestations. Not tied to execution proof.
How IRSB differs
Reputation is social and peer-based — earned from reviews, not from provable on-chain execution. IRSB reputation comes from receipts, bonds, and dispute outcomes.
EigenLayer
Restaking / Slashing$18-20B TVL. Generic slashing infrastructure via restaked ETH for Actively Validated Services (AVSs).
Their approach
General-purpose restaking and slashing. AVSs define their own validation conditions.
How IRSB differs
General-purpose slashing, not intent-specific. No receipt format, no intent dispute resolution, no solver reputation scoring.
IRSB doesn't replace these protocols. It gives them an accountability layer they don't have — standardized receipts, slashable bonds, dispute resolution, and portable reputation that works across all of them.
Get Started